Cross-record · Reading order

The programs we could price, in reading order

Ordered by derived monthly equivalent, with every unpriced record at the end rather than at zero. This is not a ranking: the one ranked list here is the buyer guide, whose order is set by the publisher rather than sorted on price.

17 programsFrom $28.00/moChecked Oct 23, 2026
Prices checked Oct 26, 2026Every figure links to the page it came fromHow the records are built

17

Programs matching this page

9/17

Billing interval confirmed

7

Programs with an unpriced required fee

17 programs · reading order by monthly cost, not a ranking

Every monthly figure on this site is derived from the charge as billed, using 365.25 days per year divided across the billing interval. A monthly equivalent is not a price the provider offers. A blank cell is not a zero. Expand a row for the first payment, fees, interval and dated source.

What this page counts

  • Every record, with priced ones ordered by monthly equivalent.
  • Unpriced records listed last, never sorted as if they cost nothing.
  • The reason each unpriced record is blank.

What it deliberately leaves out

  • A prepaid multi-month discount treated as a monthly rate. We record the shortest commitment and note the prepay instead.
  • A first-month discount, a start-now promotion or a half-price introductory month, at any provider.
  • A manufacturer list price used as a program price.
  • A company-wide subscriber count read as a number of testosterone patients.
  • A traffic figure presented as a testosterone-specific audience.
  • An estimated price, an invented average, or the midpoint of a published range.

What a published monthly figure can carry

A reported monthly figure is recorded as a monthly charge, because that is the basis the source publishes. It does not tell us the first payment, the commitment, the cancellation terms or the required lab work, so those fields stay blank on the record instead of being inferred from the month.

Why some records have no price

10 of the 17 TRT records in this edition carry a published charge. The rest do not: in most cases no provider page publishes a rate, and in one the domain no longer serves a provider site. 1 of the priced records publish a charge without a billing interval, so it appears in the list with no monthly figure derived from it. Publishing a blank is the honest outcome there. An unpriced record is left blank rather than borrowing another program’s number.

A blank price is not a cheap program

A record with no published figure can be the most expensive program in the list. We do not read silence as low cost, and we never render a blank as zero. Where a range is published, the low end drives the derived figure and the range is shown beside it.

Every monthly figure on this site is derived from the charge as billed, using 365.25 days per year divided across the billing interval. A monthly equivalent is not a price the provider offers.

On this page

Questions the record answers

Each answer is dated to the record dates behind it. Nothing here is a clinical answer.

Why is an unpriced program listed last rather than first?

Because a blank is not a low number. Sorting it to the top would imply it is the cheapest, and sorting it to zero would do the same. It sits at the end, labeled not established.

Checked Oct 23, 2026

Why is this not the ranking?

Because the buyer guide is not a price sort. Its scores and positions are commercial judgements the publisher makes by hand, so a record with the lowest published figure can sit below a dearer one. Price never sets a score or a position.

Checked Oct 23, 2026

What is excluded from this list?

Prepaid multi-month discounts that only exist if the buyer pays up front, manufacturer list prices, and any figure that could not be tied to a dated source page.

Checked Oct 23, 2026